Here is another very well though out and very well stated post sent to me by a friend.
Scott Douglas Lemoine posted to Rev. Jake
Ok, let’s just assume that the small fraction of the population who's actually responsible for 'injecting' unnecessary contaminants into our present environment, are as helpless when it comes to refusing their orders as the rest of us. The intentional manipulation of our consciousness via the media and chemicals that adulterate and suppress our minds and bodies has been taking place for generations. So let's address the situation for what it is, and try to quit making everything personal, as if someone else is more to blame for promoting this level of ignorance than we are for tolerating it. I realize that there's a little 'white speck' on top of this pile of chicken shit, but they are just chicken shit (people) too. If I had a voice or was in a position to represent the people I love right now, I would pick something that your state representative is presently unwilling to acknowledge, and assemble enough people to demand a conversation on the issue.
I don't think it would be illegal to put one of our 'representatives' in a situation where they had to address 'the obvious'. Let's say for example, you are able to establish an open televised line of communication with ONE of these people (pick a 'friendly'), and after discussing the situation, that senator or congressman agree with your group, that 'this' particular situation is totally unacceptable. Not as in, we need to set up an oversight committee to look into the situation, more like, this shit is killing OUR families and it's not impossible to work together on how to make it STOP - NOW. Let that person decide who to call upon next. I'm sure there is protocol set up so our representatives know who to call, just in case the day ever comes where they have to REPRESENT the people in their district instead of pacifying them. Who would they call? Who would listen to and be willing to respond in person instead of launching an ICBM in response? I realize most people would chuckle at the thought of addressing the drug corporation’s domination of our FOOD supply because it's 'business as usual', but is there any greater threat to national security, or a larger 'state of emergency' than an infiltrated food supply? Janet Jackson's nipple was offensive enough to establish a time delay on every live broadcast, while our families getting RAPED in broad daylight -all day- every day- by 'whomever' is willing to accept responsibility for the contents of our food supply.. is totally irrelevant. I understand people's frustration, especially when you see so many ignorant decisions being made concerning our present and future, and 'prosperity' in this country has about as much chance to flourish as a fart in a windstorm. And all you hear from others is 'there's nothing you can do about it', but there IS something you can do about it. Look at it like this... if you can assemble ONE CHURCH, or ONE SCHOOL of thought that was driven to accomplish ONE small goal... like NOT adding fluoride to your state's water supply, or NOT allowing 'geoengineering' in your state... what else can you change? You have to start somewhere.
Ultimately, any kind of 'movement' or change that will have a positive effect on this country as a whole, will also affect the rest of the world. And that's the thing. WHO are you going to find to lead this removal of 'widgets' from our food supply campaign? All the church folks I've talked to say it's up to God to take care of everything, and doing God's work seems to be borderline sacrilegious, which has become a tremendous obstacle for me. HOW are you going to motivate people to understand that nothing in the world is more relevant than 'securing' our food and water supply? (I've been a miserable failure at that so far.) What kind of opposition and/or imprisonment will you fear and possibly encounter for DEMANDING A CONVERSATION? What if your local representative, the local police and sheriff dept, the VFW and the Legion hall were all on your side? I mean, who would argue against people who ‘rise up’ to address an issue that has a negative effect on each and every one of us? If you started to establish a VOICE, would the USG try to snuff you out? Who would they send? If one or more of the states ‘representatives’ were involved as well as every swinging stick with a badge and a gun was providing security.., who would get arrested, and what crime would they be charged with for DEMANDING A CONVERSATION about an issue that NONE of our representatives have addressed so far. Obviously any kind of 'event' like this would need to be broadcast and streamed to as many sources as possible.
I have this fantasy, I’m sure at least half of the federal psychologist and psychiatrist who labeled me in the past as delusional for believing a portion of the toxins in our food supply are malicious would call me delusional again… but here it goes. It doesn’t matter who you are or where you are, when it comes to matters that affect WHO has access to food and WHAT kind of chemicals will be added to their food supply… every conversation involving whomever may be charged with the responsibility to NURTURE LIFE, should be recorded, documented, and made available to the general public immediately. People in a position to make decisions for ‘the masses’ should damn well acknowledge how many people will potentially suffer and die due to their choices, because THAT”S what all of those decisions are supposed to be based upon! To me it just seems like out of all the ignorant shit we are presently tolerating, that the contents of our food and water should be at the forefront of EVERYBODY"S mind, but it's not. This is one of the few issues that have an adverse effect on every single one of us, and no matter what happens in the future.. whether it be a solar flare, economic collapse, martial law, or whatever disaster you're anticipating... if nothing is done NOW to acknowledge and address the intentional contamination of our food air and water sources, wtf is there to live for? What portion of the ‘republic’ demands more attention than ending and hopefully learning from the malicious demented experiment WE ARE ALL subjects of? If you could establish a ‘recognizable’ voice and determine the best route to exposing the TRUE results, would those ‘mad scientist’ unleash a bubonic plague in your zip code? Other than science possibly retaliating against you for acknowledging this experiment, who or what would you have to fear?? besides blind ignorance among the masses? I don’t know that answer, other than feeling like it’s a legitimate concern.
Anyway, my mailbox is unoccupied as usual with people willing to discuss how to save our families, or save this nation, or save the world. If any of you fine folks ever get tired of pissing and moaning and pointing the finger of blame in everybody else’s direction, you now have at least one suggestion on how to change the world if you know anybody else willing to assume that kind of responsibility. If I walked into your house and punched your child in the face, most of you would scour the Earth to seek revenge. If you found out that drug dealers had been sneaking into your house and injecting your child with crack or heroin, it would inspire a similar reaction. But when it comes to KNOWING your entire family is eating from an intentionally ‘tainted’ food supply, compliments of the drug dealers who regulate food safety in this country… there’s nothing you can do about it. It might take a long time for most of you to understand that all of the horrible shit happening in the world right now, especially in this country, is the result of women & children not having a voice… so the opportunity and obligation to establish one should be a task we are all willing to assume. Don’t be scared, you really have nothing to lose.
Via con dios!
Scott Douglas Lemoine posted to Rev. Jake
Ok, let’s just assume that the small fraction of the population who's actually responsible for 'injecting' unnecessary contaminants into our present environment, are as helpless when it comes to refusing their orders as the rest of us. The intentional manipulation of our consciousness via the media and chemicals that adulterate and suppress our minds and bodies has been taking place for generations. So let's address the situation for what it is, and try to quit making everything personal, as if someone else is more to blame for promoting this level of ignorance than we are for tolerating it. I realize that there's a little 'white speck' on top of this pile of chicken shit, but they are just chicken shit (people) too. If I had a voice or was in a position to represent the people I love right now, I would pick something that your state representative is presently unwilling to acknowledge, and assemble enough people to demand a conversation on the issue.
I don't think it would be illegal to put one of our 'representatives' in a situation where they had to address 'the obvious'. Let's say for example, you are able to establish an open televised line of communication with ONE of these people (pick a 'friendly'), and after discussing the situation, that senator or congressman agree with your group, that 'this' particular situation is totally unacceptable. Not as in, we need to set up an oversight committee to look into the situation, more like, this shit is killing OUR families and it's not impossible to work together on how to make it STOP - NOW. Let that person decide who to call upon next. I'm sure there is protocol set up so our representatives know who to call, just in case the day ever comes where they have to REPRESENT the people in their district instead of pacifying them. Who would they call? Who would listen to and be willing to respond in person instead of launching an ICBM in response? I realize most people would chuckle at the thought of addressing the drug corporation’s domination of our FOOD supply because it's 'business as usual', but is there any greater threat to national security, or a larger 'state of emergency' than an infiltrated food supply? Janet Jackson's nipple was offensive enough to establish a time delay on every live broadcast, while our families getting RAPED in broad daylight -all day- every day- by 'whomever' is willing to accept responsibility for the contents of our food supply.. is totally irrelevant. I understand people's frustration, especially when you see so many ignorant decisions being made concerning our present and future, and 'prosperity' in this country has about as much chance to flourish as a fart in a windstorm. And all you hear from others is 'there's nothing you can do about it', but there IS something you can do about it. Look at it like this... if you can assemble ONE CHURCH, or ONE SCHOOL of thought that was driven to accomplish ONE small goal... like NOT adding fluoride to your state's water supply, or NOT allowing 'geoengineering' in your state... what else can you change? You have to start somewhere.
Ultimately, any kind of 'movement' or change that will have a positive effect on this country as a whole, will also affect the rest of the world. And that's the thing. WHO are you going to find to lead this removal of 'widgets' from our food supply campaign? All the church folks I've talked to say it's up to God to take care of everything, and doing God's work seems to be borderline sacrilegious, which has become a tremendous obstacle for me. HOW are you going to motivate people to understand that nothing in the world is more relevant than 'securing' our food and water supply? (I've been a miserable failure at that so far.) What kind of opposition and/or imprisonment will you fear and possibly encounter for DEMANDING A CONVERSATION? What if your local representative, the local police and sheriff dept, the VFW and the Legion hall were all on your side? I mean, who would argue against people who ‘rise up’ to address an issue that has a negative effect on each and every one of us? If you started to establish a VOICE, would the USG try to snuff you out? Who would they send? If one or more of the states ‘representatives’ were involved as well as every swinging stick with a badge and a gun was providing security.., who would get arrested, and what crime would they be charged with for DEMANDING A CONVERSATION about an issue that NONE of our representatives have addressed so far. Obviously any kind of 'event' like this would need to be broadcast and streamed to as many sources as possible.
I have this fantasy, I’m sure at least half of the federal psychologist and psychiatrist who labeled me in the past as delusional for believing a portion of the toxins in our food supply are malicious would call me delusional again… but here it goes. It doesn’t matter who you are or where you are, when it comes to matters that affect WHO has access to food and WHAT kind of chemicals will be added to their food supply… every conversation involving whomever may be charged with the responsibility to NURTURE LIFE, should be recorded, documented, and made available to the general public immediately. People in a position to make decisions for ‘the masses’ should damn well acknowledge how many people will potentially suffer and die due to their choices, because THAT”S what all of those decisions are supposed to be based upon! To me it just seems like out of all the ignorant shit we are presently tolerating, that the contents of our food and water should be at the forefront of EVERYBODY"S mind, but it's not. This is one of the few issues that have an adverse effect on every single one of us, and no matter what happens in the future.. whether it be a solar flare, economic collapse, martial law, or whatever disaster you're anticipating... if nothing is done NOW to acknowledge and address the intentional contamination of our food air and water sources, wtf is there to live for? What portion of the ‘republic’ demands more attention than ending and hopefully learning from the malicious demented experiment WE ARE ALL subjects of? If you could establish a ‘recognizable’ voice and determine the best route to exposing the TRUE results, would those ‘mad scientist’ unleash a bubonic plague in your zip code? Other than science possibly retaliating against you for acknowledging this experiment, who or what would you have to fear?? besides blind ignorance among the masses? I don’t know that answer, other than feeling like it’s a legitimate concern.
Anyway, my mailbox is unoccupied as usual with people willing to discuss how to save our families, or save this nation, or save the world. If any of you fine folks ever get tired of pissing and moaning and pointing the finger of blame in everybody else’s direction, you now have at least one suggestion on how to change the world if you know anybody else willing to assume that kind of responsibility. If I walked into your house and punched your child in the face, most of you would scour the Earth to seek revenge. If you found out that drug dealers had been sneaking into your house and injecting your child with crack or heroin, it would inspire a similar reaction. But when it comes to KNOWING your entire family is eating from an intentionally ‘tainted’ food supply, compliments of the drug dealers who regulate food safety in this country… there’s nothing you can do about it. It might take a long time for most of you to understand that all of the horrible shit happening in the world right now, especially in this country, is the result of women & children not having a voice… so the opportunity and obligation to establish one should be a task we are all willing to assume. Don’t be scared, you really have nothing to lose.
Via con dios!
